Browsing Category

Music Advice

The Music Industry’s Role in Supporting Trans Rights Amid Legal Setbacks

Posted on 22 April 2025
Trans

The UK Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the legal definition of “woman” has sent ripples through society, particularly affecting the trans community. By determining that “woman” refers strictly to biological sex under the Equality Act 2010, the court has excluded transgender women, even those with Gender Recognition Certificates, from this legal category. While the ruling maintains certain protections for transgender individuals, it has sparked concerns about increased marginalisation and the potential erosion of rights.

In this context, the music industry, known for its history of embracing diversity and challenging societal norms, has a pivotal role to play. Beyond entertainment, music can be a powerful platform for advocacy, inclusion, and support. This article explores how the music industry can actively support transgender individuals in the UK, fostering safe spaces, amplifying voices, and promoting understanding. Even though the music industry and many  other industries are suffering under the weight of the cost-of-living crisis, and our government seems to be actively making life more difficult for the most vulnerable members of our society, that doesn’t mean we have the right to turn away. Trans burnout is real, and the trans community needs allies more than ever. It may not be our fight, but that still doesn’t mean complicity through silence is right.

Understanding the Impact of the Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court’s decision has significant implications for transgender individuals in the UK. By legally defining “woman” based solely on biological sex, the ruling excludes transgender women from certain legal recognitions and protections. This decision has been met with concern from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, who fear it may legitimise exclusionary practices and increase discrimination.

Transgender individuals already face disproportionate levels of discrimination, mental health challenges, and violence. The ruling has already exacerbated these issues by reinforcing societal biases and limiting access to gender-affirming spaces and services. If you go on X, it’s already more of a dumpster fire of transphobia. TERFS feel vindicated after the success of the JK Rowling-funded court case. Of course they do, they feel like it’s a victory for women’s rights, but the belief that trans people were ever attempting to diminish women’s rights is a barefaced lie, a conduit for the contempt for a misunderstood minority in society. It is crucial to recognise that legal definitions have real-world consequences, affecting the daily lives and well-being of transgender people.​

Creating Safe and Inclusive Spaces in the Music Industry

The music industry has long been a haven for self-expression and community building. However, it must continually assess and improve its inclusivity, particularly for transgender individuals. Creating safe spaces involves more than just open-mindedness; it requires intentional actions and policies.​

Venues and festivals should implement clear anti-discrimination policies, provide gender-neutral facilities, and ensure staff are trained in inclusivity and sensitivity. Organisations like the Musicians’ Union offer resources and support for LGBTQ+ musicians, including safe space services and legal assistance.

Moreover, representation matters. Booking transgender artists, featuring their stories, and promoting their work can foster a more inclusive environment. Initiatives like TransForm Music in Wales highlight the importance of creating spaces specifically for transgender and non-binary musicians, providing platforms for their voices and experiences.

Amplifying Trans Voices Through Music and Media

Music has the power to tell stories, challenge norms, and inspire change. By amplifying transgender voices, the industry can contribute to greater visibility and understanding.​

Artists can use their platforms to address transgender issues, collaborate with transgender musicians, and support LGBTQ+ causes. Media outlets and music publications should prioritise coverage of transgender artists, ensuring their work and perspectives are shared widely.​

Educational initiatives, such as workshops and panels, can also play a role in raising awareness and fostering dialogue. By engaging audiences in conversations about gender identity and inclusion, the music industry can help dismantle prejudices and promote empathy.​ So much of the media representing trans people has portrayed them in a negative light. The Disclosure documentary tracks how, throughout history, trans people have been depicted as nothing more than the butt of jokes, horror-esque villains or victims. It’s time to ensure representation is realistic, depicting the true diversity of the trans community and celebrating what they individually bring to society.

Advocating for Policy Changes and Support Systems

Beyond individual actions, the music industry can advocate for systemic changes to support transgender individuals. This includes lobbying for inclusive policies, supporting organisations that provide resources and assistance to the transgender community, and investing in programs that address the unique challenges faced by transgender musicians.​

Collaborations with advocacy groups can amplify efforts to promote equality and challenge discriminatory practices. By uniting voices and resources, the industry can contribute to a broader movement towards inclusivity and justice.​

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s ruling presents a challenge to the progress made in transgender rights in the UK. However, the music industry has the opportunity—and responsibility—to respond with solidarity and action. By creating inclusive spaces, amplifying transgender voices, and advocating for systemic change, the industry can play a crucial role in supporting one of society’s most vulnerable communities.​

In times of adversity, music has always been a source of comfort, resistance, and unity. Let it continue to serve as a beacon for inclusivity and a catalyst for change.​

Article by Amelia Vandergast

Isolation in the UK: How Politics Has Tainted the Touring Circuit

Posted on 17 April 2025
Touring

For decades, the UK’s live music scene hasn’t just been a domestic force to reckon with – it’s been an unstoppable export. We’ve seen artists go from sticky pub stages in Salford to sold-out stadiums in Seattle. But now, as political borders thicken and international tensions ramp up, the dream of breaking out across the Atlantic or even the Channel is starting to curdle. Touring has always been hard graft, but it used to feel possible. These days, it’s starting to feel more like a political obstacle course than a rite of passage.

From the layers of Brexit-induced bureaucracy to the casual criminalisation of UK musicians entering the US under Trump-era policies, it’s becoming clear that if you’re a UK artist with international ambitions, your government isn’t exactly batting for you. With musicians getting hauled off planes, grilled at customs, and sometimes falsely arrested just for carrying a guitar, it’s less about where we went wrong and more about whether there’s any way out of this touring hellscape.

The American (Border) Nightmare

If you thought clearing US customs was already a stressful endeavour, spare a thought for the UK musicians who’ve been arrested under false pretences since Trump resumed the presidency. It’s not just a case of awkward questions at passport control anymore – we’re seeing legitimate artists, who’ve followed the rules, getting thrown into detention over supposed “work visa” violations, even when they’re on promotional visits or have everything in order. The policy might not be written in neon, but the treatment suggests that British musicians are being viewed as threats, not guests.

Trump’s policies have always leaned towards heavy-handed nationalism, but the impact on the arts has often flown under the radar. That’s no longer possible. With reports mounting about musicians being wrongfully detained or sent back on the next flight out, there’s a worrying precedent forming – one where artistic exchange is being flattened under the weight of political paranoia. For emerging artists trying to make it in America, the cost isn’t just financial – it’s psychological. Who’s going to book a showcase gig in Brooklyn if there’s a chance they’ll be arrested before soundcheck?

Even with the correct documentation, British bands are facing a roulette wheel of subjective decisions made by under-trained and over-empowered border officials. It’s become a gamble where the stakes include missed shows, lost money, damaged reputations, and sometimes, the end of a tour before it begins.

Europe Isn’t Much Better

While America’s customs chaos is grabbing headlines, Europe’s post-Brexit touring terrain isn’t exactly welcoming either. Since we gleefully cut ourselves adrift from the EU, artists now face a labyrinth of red tape that can strangle even the most meticulously planned tour. Carnets are the new boogeymen – the bureaucratic bundles of joy that require artists to document every bit of gear they’re taking with them, right down to the last guitar pedal. Forget your socket adapters at your peril.

Once you’ve waded through the paperwork, you’ll still need to contend with snide border checks and ‘random’ searches that suddenly feel less than random when they keep happening at the same checkpoints. European promoters are equally frustrated, but it’s the bands bearing the brunt – forced to hire customs consultants, fork out for permits, and absorb the extra costs without passing it onto already cash-strapped fans.

There’s also the classic logistical mind melt of sending merch overseas. For small artists selling a few limited-edition vinyls to French or German fans, postage has become a joke. With customs charges slamming fans and delays rendering delivery dates meaningless, some bands are ditching EU fans altogether to save themselves the grief. Touring Europe used to be a way to break even, build an audience, and make memories. Now it’s an expensive endurance test.

Staying Home, Staying Sane

With all this considered, it’s little wonder that so many UK bands are choosing to stay on home turf. You might still break down on the M6 or lose your voice halfway through a set in Hull, but at least you won’t end up in a holding cell in New Jersey or get turned away from the Netherlands because someone misread your carnet.

The cost of living crisis hasn’t skipped past musicians either. When every litre of fuel feels like it’s been blessed by Midas and venue fees are climbing, why risk international chaos when you can play to a loyal UK crowd who’ll buy a pint, a t-shirt, and tell their mates? The problem is, that safe choice often means playing to the same audience over and over again, limiting growth and long-term sustainability.

For the artists who thrive on international stages – the ones who built their fanbases city by city in Europe or the States – this isolation is more than a logistical nuisance. It’s an artistic prison. Global exposure isn’t just about streaming numbers; it’s about building real communities in real places. When artists lose access to those stages, they lose a major part of their identity.

What Now? What Next?

So, where does this leave the UK music industry? In a bit of a mess, to put it bluntly. The question isn’t how we got here – that’s painfully obvious to anyone who’s been paying attention since 2016. The real question is whether there’s a way out.

There have been campaigns. There have been petitions. There have even been half-hearted murmurs from the government about making things easier for musicians. But so far, those murmurs haven’t translated into policy change. It feels like the government is far more interested in regulating protest songs than supporting the people who write them.

Some artists are adapting by taking fewer band members abroad, using session musicians overseas to cut complications, or turning to digital performances and livestreams. Others are forming alliances with European artists to navigate the mess together. A few are risking it all and touring regardless – sometimes without permits, sometimes with just enough documentation to squeak by. It’s not ideal. It’s not sustainable. But when has music ever been about playing it safe?

There are also grassroots collectives springing up to support touring musicians, offering guidance on paperwork, pooling transport and gear to cut costs, and sharing contacts to avoid dodgy agents or hostile promoters. These underground networks are doing the work that the government refuses to do, but even they can only go so far without structural change.

Conclusion: The Music Is Willing, the Borders Are Not

The UK has never had a problem producing talent. What it’s got now is a logistical nightmare that’s clipping the wings of its artists before they’ve even left the ground. Touring has always been a slog, but it used to come with the promise of growth. Now, it comes with spreadsheets, legal risks, and border interrogations.

We’re past the point of gentle frustration. This is an industry-shaking problem, one that punishes creativity and encourages insularity. And while fans will still show up, buy merch, and shout lyrics back to the stage, we’re all losing out when artists are

Article by Amelia Vandergast

Your Technical Skill Won’t Save You – Why Emotion and Authenticity Matter More Than Perfection

Posted on 7 April 2025
Authenticity

In a music industry overflowing with talent, technical perfection has never been more accessible. The recording technology is sharper than ever, AI can write chart-ready lyrics in seconds, and there are enough YouTube tutorials to school even the clumsiest hands into playing in 5/4 time. But here’s the problem – none of that matters if your music is emotionally vacant and void of authenticity. The songs that stand the test of time, the ones that carve out a space in people’s lives, don’t earn that reverence through faultless production or clever imitation. They do it by feeling real. No amount of studio polish or virtuosity can mask the absence of emotional intention or the weightless imitation of artists who bled for their art.

Emotion Isn’t Optional – It’s the Whole Point

There’s a temptation, especially for artists early in their careers, to treat emotion as something to be added later. A garnish. But if your music doesn’t start with emotion, it has nowhere meaningful to go. The most jaw-dropping guitar solo or acrobatic vocal line is pointless if it doesn’t make someone feel something. This doesn’t mean every track has to be tragic or soaked in angst, but it does mean the emotion needs to be there from the seed of the song. It has to be felt, not fabricated. Emotion is the core material – not the decoration.

Take artists like Elliott Smith or Daniel Johnston. By technical standards, their recordings are miles behind what most unsigned bands can do today on a bedroom setup. But what they do have is emotional immediacy that makes even a whispered lyric sound like a scream in the dark. People connect to that. They need it. You can’t fake that kind of resonance. You can’t auto-tune it in.

Authenticity Isn’t a Marketing Tool

Authenticity has been chewed up and spat out by brand strategists, to the point that some artists think it’s enough to look authentic without ever having to be it. But authenticity isn’t about what you wear, which pedals you use, or dropping names of obscure influences in interviews. It’s about writing from where you actually are. That means resisting the temptation to pretend you’ve lived a different life just because it would sell more records or resonate better in the US market.

If you’re from Croydon, don’t pretend you grew up on a Louisiana porch listening to Lynyrd Skynyrd through the floorboards of your uncle’s bar. Audiences are smarter than ever. They can smell the lie before the second verse. Instead of scrambling to borrow someone else’s voice, focus on developing your own. That’s what will make you memorable. That’s what turns a good song into your song.

Assimilation Kills Art

There’s nothing wrong with being influenced – it’s unavoidable. Every artist is a patchwork of everything they’ve ever loved. But there’s a line between drawing influence and becoming a soulless tribute act. Too many acts stop at emulation. They learn the sonic tricks, the aesthetic, the moves on stage – and then wonder why no one’s talking about their music with any real enthusiasm. It’s because people already have the real thing. Why would they settle for your pale imitation of Nick Cave or your second-rate Billie Eilish cosplay?

Some of the worst examples come from UK-based rock bands that chase the southern rock dragon with the desperation of a tourist buying cowboy boots in Camden. They’ve got the gravel in the vocals, the slide guitar, and lyrics about dirt roads and neon bars – but there’s no cultural context, no lived experience, and crucially, no authenticity or conviction. It’s cosplay, not art. And it’s boring.

If you’re going to write in a genre that isn’t native to your background, you need to bring something new to it. Subvert it. Twist it. Add the tension of your own cultural voice. That’s how genres evolve. If you’re just painting by numbers, all you’re doing is wasting everyone’s time.

Originality is a Risk Worth Taking

One of the main reasons artists end up imitating rather than innovating with authenticity is fear. If you sound like someone already successful, then surely there’s a built-in audience waiting for you – right? Not really. Those fans are already loyal to the originators, and they’ll spot a copy from miles away. If you try to shortcut your way to credibility by sounding like someone else, you’ll forever be a footnote in someone else’s story.

True originality often feels risky. It usually means writing a song that makes you feel exposed. Saying something in a way you’re not sure anyone else will understand. But that’s where the magic happens. That’s where you find the hooks that dig deeper than just the melody. The artists who make the deepest impact are the ones willing to write the songs that nobody else would think to write – not because they were trying to be different, but because they were telling the truth.

Make Music That Hurts a Little

If it doesn’t hurt to write, it won’t stick with anyone listening. That doesn’t mean every song has to be a confessional dirge, but it does mean that the process of making music should cost you something. A bit of pride, a bit of safety, a bit of the armour we all wear to get through the day.

Too many artists are afraid to be ugly in their music. They want it all to be perfectly lit and meticulously worded. But some of the best lyrics in history are clumsy, weird, and unfiltered. That’s what makes them human. There’s no point writing songs that only exist to be background noise for TikTok videos. Write something people would sit alone in a car and cry to. Write the track someone plays five years after a breakup. Write the song that means something even when the hype has gone. That’s the only way to build anything with lasting value.

Conclusion: If You’re Not Feeling It, No One Else Will

The truth is brutal but necessary – your talent will mean nothing if you’ve got nothing to say with authenticity. The most respected artists aren’t necessarily the most technically gifted. They’re the ones who found a way to be honest, raw, and distinct. They didn’t get there by sanding down their rough edges or imitating their heroes to the letter. They got there by letting people in – even when it was uncomfortable.

So, before you invest in another vocal chain plug-in or spend three hours on a photoshoot trying to look like 2005-era Julian Casablancas, take a moment. Ask yourself why you’re really making music. Ask if you’re telling your story, or someone else’s. Ask if what you’re writing costs you something. And if the answer is no – it’s time to start over. Not because you’ve failed, but because you’re finally ready to make something real.

For more advice on how to make an impact with your music, consider our one-to-one artist consultancy services.

Article by Amelia Vandergast

Diversity vs Meritocracy: What the Music Industry Really Needs

Posted on 25 March 2025
Meritocracy

The gender representation debate in music refuses to fizzle out, and when festival season rolls around, the same scrutiny makes the rounds again. Social media erupts with line-up graphics covered in red ink, blotting out every act not fronted by a woman or non-binary performer. The intention is always the same: to hold organisers accountable for inequality. But in aiming for fairness, are we risking meritocracy in favour of optics? And more crucially, are we asking the right questions when we demand more diversity on the main stages of male-dominated festivals, especially in genres like rock?

There’s no denying that there are institutional problems in the industry that need addressing. But the call for representation for representation’s sake doesn’t solve the deeper issues—it just papers over them. When there are already hundreds of fiercely talented female artists dominating the charts and reshaping genres on their own terms, the argument that women are being universally shunned starts to collapse under the weight of its own simplicity.

Let’s step back and actually look at what the music industry needs right now, and whether the fight for better representation is addressing the real causes of inequality—or just its symptoms.

Festival Line-Ups: Visibility or Virtue Signalling?

Each year, line-up announcements for major rock festivals are met with outrage. It’s always a similar narrative: the top slots are packed with male-fronted bands, and women are relegated to the small print. The reaction is understandable; representation matters, and the optics of a line-up send a message about who belongs in the scene. But in some cases, the demand for an equal split starts to look more like a numbers game than a push for quality.

If the goal is fairness, forcing balance without addressing the pipeline that feeds these stages ends up being superficial. Are there as many active, high-profile female-fronted rock acts currently touring as there are male bands? Possibly not. But is that a reflection of discrimination on the part of festivals, or is it a result of fewer women currently pursuing rock as a genre in comparison to others?

It’s easy to point fingers at curators, but if we want true parity, we need to ask why the representation isn’t naturally more equal—and whether manipulating line-ups to appear balanced is actually achieving anything meaningful.

Merit Should Always Come First—But the Playing Field Must Be Level

It’s possible to advocate for both meritocracy and diversity without letting one undermine the other. The music industry should always prioritise talent, originality, and audience connection over identity politics. No artist wants to get a slot because of their gender; they want to get it because they deserve to be there. And as much as organisers have a responsibility to open doors, pushing artists into spaces they haven’t earned, just to appease a demographic expectation, helps no one—least of all the artists themselves.

But meritocracy only works when the playing field is level. If women are struggling to access rehearsal spaces, gear, mentors, or even the confidence to enter traditionally male genres, then of course fewer of them will climb to the level where festival slots make sense. So while the aim should never be to artificially inflate numbers, the responsibility lies in creating an environment where anyone, regardless of gender, can thrive and compete on equal terms.

The Problem Isn’t Visibility—It’s Pigeonholing

It’s disingenuous to suggest that women aren’t visible in music. Some of the most influential and commercially successful artists of this generation are women—Taylor Swift, Charli XCX, Sabrina Carpenter, SZA, Olivia Rodrigo, Lana Del Rey. In pop, RnB, indie, folk, soul, and electronica, women are leading the charge. The genre-specific disparity in rock is real, but it doesn’t reflect a systemic shunning of female artists across the board. It reflects the entrenched cultural associations of certain genres.

Rock has long been framed as a boys’ club, rooted in machismo and mythologised male rebellion. Women in rock are not new, but they’ve always had to fight for space in a scene that was never built with them in mind. That cultural coding matters. It’s what keeps some women from even picking up a guitar. But the answer to that isn’t to shoehorn women into line-ups—it’s to reframe the genre and who it belongs to.

Artists like Nova Twins, Pale Waves, and Chappell Roan are already proving that women are reshaping rock on their own terms. The genre doesn’t need charity; it needs cultural rewiring.

Gatekeeping vs Demand: What’s Actually Holding Women Back in Rock?

For all the noise about male-dominated scenes, it’s worth asking whether gatekeeping is the main reason women aren’t headlining rock festivals—or whether it comes down to demand. The live music industry, particularly festivals, is commercially driven. Curators book what sells tickets. If an all-male headliner lineup consistently sells out faster than a gender-diverse one, that tells us something—not necessarily about misogyny, but about market forces.

Of course, those forces are shaped by decades of inherited bias. But if the goal is sustainability, we can’t ignore the economics. Pushing female rock artists to the top of bills before they have the same level of fanbase, reach or impact doesn’t challenge the status quo—it just risks creating resentment and tokenism. It would be better to invest in building those artists up through media support, radio play, playlist curation, grassroots events, and fair funding opportunities—giving them a chance to naturally reach headline potential.

If anything needs to be dismantled, it’s the infrastructure that prevents female artists from building that reach, not the headliners already sitting on top of it.

Real Diversity Goes Deeper Than Gender

The fixation on gender representation often overshadows other, equally important diversity gaps—race, class, disability, sexuality. The music industry still leans heavily towards artists who can afford to take the financial risk, who live in cultural hubs, who have the confidence and networks to navigate the scene. That’s the deeper rot that needs addressing.

Equity doesn’t mean equal numbers across every metric; it means dismantling the specific obstacles that stop talented people from progressing. In some cases, that’s misogyny. In others, it’s poverty, neurodivergence, or a lack of industry connections. There’s no one-size-fits-all solution, and trying to enforce surface-level representation won’t change the industry unless it’s part of a wider cultural shift.

What the industry really needs is to stop treating identity like a box to tick and start creating conditions where merit and representation are aligned—not at odds.

Conclusion: Representation That Isn’t Earned Doesn’t Fix the Problem

No one is arguing against the value of representation. Seeing someone who looks like you on stage or at the top of the charts is powerful. It sends a message that you belong. But if that representation isn’t earned through merit, it rings hollow—and it risks undermining the very people it’s meant to support.

The music industry needs to keep breaking down barriers—but it also needs to resist the temptation to turn identity into a marketing tactic. There’s more than enough female talent to warrant fairer line-ups without forcing the issue. The problem isn’t that women aren’t capable or interested; it’s that the industry hasn’t made it easy for them to thrive in every genre.

Diversity and meritocracy aren’t opposing forces. They can—and should—exist together. But the push for gender balance must be rooted in honest critique, not reactive politics. If the goal is a healthier, more inclusive industry, we need to look beneath the surface of the line-ups and ask what’s really stopping artists from getting the recognition they deserve.

Article by Amelia Vandergast

The Music Industry’s Role in Musicians’ Mental Health: A Critical Examination

Posted on 11 March 2025
Mental Health

The recent article published by The Guardian on 7 March 2025, titled “High suicide rates show music industry ‘profoundly dangerous’, researchers say,” has reignited discussions about the mental health challenges faced by musicians. The article presents alarming statistics indicating that musicians have one of the highest suicide rates among occupational groups, both in England and the United States. While the piece attributes these rates to the inherent dangers of the music industry, it is crucial to adopt a balanced perspective that considers both the industry’s systemic issues and the individual mental health challenges that artists face.​

The Music Industry: A Breeding Ground for Mental Health Challenges?

The Guardian article highlights several factors within the music industry that contribute to mental distress among musicians:

  • Economic Insecurity: Many musicians grapple with unstable income, leading to financial stress and uncertainty.​
  • Performance Anxiety: The pressure to deliver flawless performances can result in heightened anxiety levels.​
  • Intense Touring Schedules: Prolonged periods away from home, coupled with demanding tour schedules, can disrupt personal relationships and lead to exhaustion.​theguardian.com+2theguardian.com+2scholarlycommons.pacific.edu+2

These challenges are corroborated by other studies. For instance, a 2019 survey by the Swedish digital platform Record Union revealed that 73% of independent musicians reported struggling with mental illness, with the figure rising to 80% among those aged 18-25. ​

However, attributing high suicide rates solely to the industry’s environment may oversimplify a complex issue. While the industry’s pressures are undeniable, individual factors, such as personal history, genetic predisposition, and pre-existing mental health conditions, also play significant roles.​

The Therapeutic Role of Music: Expression and Self-Awareness

Music has long been recognised as a powerful medium for emotional expression and self-reflection. For many artists, creating music serves as a therapeutic outlet, allowing them to process personal experiences and societal observations. This form of artistic expression can lead to (or be reflective of) heightened self-awareness and a deeper understanding of both personal and collective struggles.​

However, this heightened sensitivity can be a double-edged sword. While it enables artists to produce profoundly moving work, it can also make them more susceptible to mental health challenges. The constant introspection required for artistic creation may amplify feelings of anxiety and depression, especially when combined with external pressures from the industry.​

Systemic Issues vs. Individual Responsibility: A Balanced Perspective

The Guardian article emphasises the need for systemic changes within the music industry to address these mental health challenges. Recommendations include implementing a “zero suicide framework” and providing better support systems for artists.

While systemic reforms are essential, it is equally important to recognise the role of individual responsibility and proactive mental health management. Artists, like professionals in any field, must be encouraged to seek help when needed and to develop coping strategies to navigate the unique challenges of their careers.​

Moreover, the romanticised notion of the “tortured artist” can be detrimental, perpetuating the idea that suffering is intrinsic to creativity. This stereotype not only stigmatises mental health struggles but may also discourage artists from seeking help.​ Just think about the societal backlash faced by musicians who decide to go sober to improve their mental and physical health and how this is often met with resistance by people who think that artists should live up to the sex, drugs and rock n roll stereotypes. Musicians are expected to live a life of hedonistic excess, only for music fans to act surprised when living a self-destructive life leads to an early death.

Moving Forward: A Collaborative Approach

Addressing the mental health crisis among musicians requires a collaborative effort between the industry, mental health professionals, and the artists themselves:​

  • Industry Initiatives: Record labels and management companies should prioritise artists’ well-being by offering mental health resources, establishing reasonable work schedules, and fostering supportive environments.​
  • Mental Health Education: Providing education on mental health can empower artists to recognise signs of distress and seek timely intervention.​
  • Community Support: Peer support networks can offer a sense of community and understanding, reducing feelings of isolation among artists.​

By adopting a holistic approach that addresses both systemic issues and individual needs, the music industry can create a safer and more supportive environment for its artists.​

Conclusion

The high suicide rates among musicians are a grave concern that necessitates immediate attention. While the music industry does present unique challenges that can exacerbate mental health issues, it is overly simplistic to hold the industry solely accountable. A balanced approach that considers both systemic reforms and individual mental health management is crucial. Recognising the therapeutic potential of music, fostering open discussions about mental health, and implementing comprehensive support systems can collectively contribute to the well-being of musicians. By doing so, we not only preserve the lives of artists but also enrich the cultural tapestry they so profoundly influence.​

Article by Amelia Vandergast

The Stronghold of Music Communities in an Unravelling World

Posted on 16 February 2025
Communities

Music has always carried a sense of unity, but in our current reality—where screens and headlines tend to drive us further from one another—its unifying qualities feel more vital than ever. The pull of sound waves cutting through life’s chaos has kept us tethered to something that feels deeply genuine.

In an era defined by digital interactions, it seems we’re losing communal spaces faster than we can yearn for them. Yet, the music scene remains steadfast, serving as one of the last true forms of togetherness that transcends superficial online connections. If there’s one thing my time in the industry has taught me, it’s that music-centred communities serve a higher purpose than simple entertainment—they can hold people together, providing solace, support, and, for some, even a reason to keep going.

This article will explore how music communities continue to uphold that sense of unity, how artists can become catalysts for supportive networks, how candid and vulnerable lyrics motivate fans to reveal and process their own struggles, and why that same openness can lead to some unusual moments at merch stalls.

  1. The Community Cornerstone That Music Creates

In a world that seems to be more about superficial scrolling than heartfelt conversation, music-centred communities stand out as sanctuaries of shared experience. What can be more unifying than feeling the same ripples of excitement sweep over an entire crowd when a band launches into a song that means something personal to almost everyone present?

One reason these environments develop such deep connections lies in the visceral nature of music. Listening isn’t just about letting sound pass through us; a sentimental melody can excavate feelings that may have lain dormant otherwise; a burst in a chorus can shed our inhibitions, let the ego slip and reveal our authentic selves. In fan communities, favourite tracks can become anchors in identities, they can forge emotional foundations that help fans connect with others who have also found a piece of their story in the same lyrics.

Similarly, music events and club nights serve as rallying points for individuals seeking respite from the daily drudgery of life. When you walk into a venue, you’re greeted by a world where differences momentarily fade, and a collective sense of belonging takes hold. For many, these events aren’t just about hearing live versions of tracks; they become quasi-ritual gatherings where everyone invests in a common purpose.

  1. Fostering Connection Through Shared Spaces

It’s all very well to say that music fosters community, but how can artists create tangible frameworks for these supportive circles to flourish? The obvious answer might be playing gigs, but it extends beyond that. Gigs are important, of course—especially if the performer makes an effort to involve the audience in an experience bigger than just a live rendition of the album. A few heartfelt words between songs, a moment where the lights go down and the crowd is encouraged to sway in unison, or a spontaneous jam that invites the fans to feel part of the creative process: these subtle touches all help define the atmosphere and unite the audience.

Artists who truly value their fan bases also find ways to keep people connected beyond their live shows. Launching a social media group can be a good start, but let’s face it: the online world can be a tricky place for building genuine warmth. The crucial ingredient lies in ensuring a personal element is preserved, even when communicating through digital means.

For instance, Q&A sessions, behind-the-scenes tour vlogs, or fan-submitted stories can help transform passively scrolling fans into a close-knit group that interacts with each other as well as with the artist. Regular updates that speak to the struggles and triumphs in the creative process also go a long way in ensuring fans feel they have a stake in the artist’s journey.

It’s also worth noting the power of meet-and-greet events when done right. We’ve all seen the awkward photo-op lines that resemble rushed conveyor belts, but it doesn’t have to be that way. When an artist sets aside proper time or organises smaller-scale gatherings, it fosters an environment where fans can connect not just with the artist but also with one another. Sometimes, these shared meet-and-greet experiences cultivate friendships that transcend the initial encounter, forming lasting relationships grounded in a mutual passion for the music. It’s about going that extra mile to ensure no one is left feeling like a transaction, but instead feels like an essential part of a community’s heartbeat.

  1. The Power of Vulnerable Lyrics

Nothing forges a bond between artists and fans quite like emotional honesty in songwriting. When artists write in a confessional manner, they peel back layers of human experience and invite their audience to witness the depths of their struggles, triumphs, and everything in between. For anyone who’s grappled with that same heartbreak, mental health battle, or existential dread, hearing it expressed by someone else can be an almost cathartic reminder that they’re not alone.

Fans can feel surprisingly close to an artist they’ve never met if they sense an echo of their own life in the lyrics. It’s a uniquely intimate relationship formed around songs that articulate truths which might otherwise remain unspoken in daily life. The question is: how does that translate into genuine community? Well, music listeners are more likely to let down their guard around people who share that identical song-induced emotional release. If you’ve ever found yourself shouting along to a heartbreak anthem next to another person in a crowd, you’ll understand just how meaningful that unspoken sense of camaraderie can be.

Yet, it takes courage for artists to present music that isn’t superficially glossed over. Vulnerable lyrics risk scrutiny and misunderstanding, but they also open the door to something honest and transformative. People gravitate to self-awareness, and once they see an artist wearing their heart on their sleeve, they often feel permission to do the same. The result is a sense of unity shaped by more than just ephemeral pop hooks. It’s a profound bond that can lead to real support, empathy, and a feeling that someone out there genuinely ‘gets you.’ In that regard, music-centred communities have a rare capacity to heal some of the fractures our disconnected era imposes upon us.

  1. The Strange Phenomenon of Merch Stall Confessions

Of course, with all this honesty swirling around in a heightened atmosphere of raw emotion, artists can find themselves at the epicentre of some intense fan interactions—especially at the merch table. This setting, where fans buy T-shirts, vinyl, or get a fleeting chance to shake the artist’s hand, often doubles as an impromptu confession booth. In quieter moments after a gig, an unsuspecting artist might be bracing themselves for a simple “thank you for the show,” only to receive a torrent of highly personal stories, with fans sharing life-altering grief, heartbreak, or mental health crises.

Why does this happen? It’s partly because those vulnerable lyrics and the sense of community create an implicit understanding that the artist is not only a performer but also a confidant—someone who has ‘been there.’ When you hear a track that resonates with your greatest pains, you may feel a powerful impulse to tell the person who wrote it how much it meant to you. Often, that gratitude spills over, and fans reveal details they might not even share with close friends or family.

While it’s a testament to the deep connections forged by music, it also poses challenges for artists, who might not be equipped to handle the emotional weight of multiple fans’ deepest traumas. There’s no universal rulebook for how artists ought to respond to these raw outpourings. Some handle it with compassion and openness, offering hugs or a few words of encouragement. Others set boundaries to protect their mental wellbeing. Both approaches have their merits, and no one can dictate that there’s a single correct way to navigate this deeply personal exchange.

However, what’s undeniably clear is that these intimate moments at the merch stall highlight just how strong the communal bond can be in the music world. It’s a place where the lines between performer and audience dissolve, replaced by a shared recognition of the complicated journeys we’re all on.

Article by Amelia Vandergast

When the Underground Goes Mainstream: The Realities of Popularity and Fan Loyalty

Posted on 9 February 2025
Mainstream

If you’ve spent any time skulking around grassroots gig venues or digging through crates of self-released EPs, you’ve probably seen it happen: a band emerges from a local scene, becomes a beloved mainstay in the underground, and suddenly, that hush-hush secret is plastered all over mainstream media. The next thing you know, the once-beloved group is getting a barrage of side-eyes, and the diehard fans who used to gush about their brilliance now accuse them of abandoning their roots.

But what’s really happening behind the scenes to cause this fallout? Part of it is tied to the tribalism that fuels any music culture. We’ve all felt that sense of pride from discovering a band before the masses and latching on to them when they were fresh-faced underdogs playing sweatbox gigs. Once that air of exclusivity fades and the mainstream gatekeepers start calling, all the warmth and excitement that once pulsed through the scene can morph into scepticism. Because once a band’s name is up in lights, the show suddenly feels less personal.

It’s not always the artist’s fault. Growth in popularity often comes with external pressures that nudge a band towards changes in style or image. Sometimes, it’s a label’s demand for a more radio-friendly track. Other times, it’s the natural creative evolution of musicians who, ironically, run the risk of being called sell-outs for doing exactly what they set out to do: make their mark on the wider world. But how much of this change is acceptable, and how much is a betrayal of everything that made them special?

The Grassroots Connection: Seedbeds of Devotion

There’s an undeniably special connection formed between artists and fans when music is discovered on a grassroots level. It’s the kind of loyalty forged in intimate venues, with sweat-soaked walls echoing back songs that may not even have an official release yet. When fans first connect with a band in this raw setting, it’s natural for them to feel a certain kind of ownership. They were there before the major labels swooped in, before the hype machines powered up, before the fanfare of endorsement deals and chart success.

In these early stages, your average music lover feels like they’re part of something exclusive. They may even help shift the artist’s self-made CDs, turn up to every back-street gig, and passionately spread the word amongst their mates. The relationship between the artist and these supporters is personal. Artists greet them after shows, share stories over the merch table, and bond over the dream of climbing the industry ladder. It’s the fans’ emotional investment that makes them so proud when they watch their once-obscure favourites break new ground. Yet the moment that success arrives, those same fans are often the first to criticise any perceived changes. It’s as if their private corner of the music world has been invaded by the masses.

Social psychology has a role to play here. We all crave a sense of belonging, but there’s also a paradoxical tendency to recoil when the subculture we love becomes mainstream. The question is: Do artists owe it to those early supporters to remain exactly the same, or should they embrace the natural progression that comes with increased exposure?

The Price of Recognition: Are You ‘Selling Out’ or Evolving?

The phrase “sell-out” has trailed successful artists for generations. There’s a tragic irony to it. Fans champion artists to be heard by more people, but when that suddenly happens, they label the artists disloyal. So, let’s break down where this sense of betrayal arises from. Often, the problem is that fans are suspicious of external influences once the music enters a more commercial sphere. The pressing demands from major record labels, or the constraints of writing music that will appeal to larger audiences, can gradually shift a band’s creative vision.

Suddenly, that raw energy or off-kilter flair that made the group feel like such a unique find to begin with becomes an attempt to appeal to a global market. The tracks become a little too polished, the stage outfits look a bit too glamorous, and there’s no time left to hang around the merch table after the set. This can leave original fans longing for the lost grit, spontaneity, and closeness that made them gravitate towards the band in the first place.

Another piece of the puzzle lies in how artists change personally. As they find new opportunities, they might discover influences outside their original style, or simply grow beyond the limitations of their old sound. For many, it’s just a natural part of development. While long-time fans may perceive it as ‘abandoning’ them, it could be that the new sound is a crucial step in the artist’s musical growth. When the creative spark shifts, it doesn’t always mean an artist has bowed to commercial pressure. Sometimes, it’s just evidence of a band refusing to be tied down by what people expect of them.

The real balancing act is finding a way to keep the signature charm that fans fell in love with initially, while still being open to new experiences and influences. Fans do want to see some growth, but if it feels contrived or forced, they will raise the dreaded “sell-out” accusation. How does a band stay true to themselves once their faces start hitting billboards and they share the award ceremony stage with the biggest names in music? The question is worth pondering for anyone who wants to last in the industry without alienating the loyal supporters who were there for them from the get-go.

Staying Grounded in the Limelight: Tactics for Maintaining Likeability

For many artists, staying authentic amidst a flurry of new demands is the biggest challenge that arrives hand in hand with commercial success. It might sound easier said than done, but there are a few ways to keep the disillusionment at bay.

  • Transparent Communication: In an age of social media saturation, it’s impossible to hide big changes from your audience. Rather than presenting yourself in a ‘new and improved’ package overnight, open up about what’s happening behind the scenes. Whether you’re navigating label pressures, rethinking your creative direction, or deciding to collaborate with bigger names, let your fans come along for the journey. This can neutralise the shock factor and reassure them that you haven’t replaced your authenticity with a sparkly new veneer.
  • Retaining Intimacy: As your shows get bigger, you can’t always hang out with your entire fanbase after each gig, but there are still ways to keep up close contact. This can mean setting up meet-and-greets, Q&A sessions, or simply staying active on social media with meaningful interactions. By ensuring your supporters feel heard, they’ll be more likely to understand the transitions you’re making.
  • Avoiding Hollow Transformations: No one wants to see a band that once championed underground values suddenly switch gears and churn out radio-friendly songs for the sake of chart dominance. If you’ve always dreamed of exploring new genres, by all means, go for it. But do it on your own terms, not to fit a label’s brief or because someone has promised you a hot new collaboration that goes against everything you once stood for.
  • Keeping the Origin Story Alive: It’s easy to forget where you came from when the accolades start pouring in. Yet, remembering your roots and the people who helped you along the way builds loyalty. Don’t neglect where you started – whether that’s a small local venue that gave you your first gig or the underfunded festival that caught wind of your talents before anyone else. Keep those relationships going and show that you don’t take your upward trajectory for granted.

These steps may not guarantee that every supporter from day one will stay in your camp, but they’re often the difference between simply making it big and having a meaningful, lasting career.

Article by Amelia Vandergast

Should Independent Artists Be Promoting Their Music and Connecting with Fans Via BlueSky?

Posted on 2 February 2025
BlueSky

Social media networks come and go at an astonishing rate, with the rise of BlueSky, many independent artists are asking themselves whether they should jump on board yet another platform. Some are tired of the continual wave of new digital spaces, while others feel obliged to embrace every opportunity to spread the word of their music.

To make the decision a little easier, this blog will cover why BlueSky was created, the advantages and disadvantages of joining as an independent musician, and how it throws another element into an already complex social media sphere. We’ll also explore the value of using posting tools, such as Metricool, to help manage these constant demands. If you’re weighing up whether BlueSky might be a valuable piece of your promotional puzzle, read on.

The Backstory of BlueSky

BlueSky is essentially a new project that emerged with a vision of offering decentralised social networking. It began with connections to Twitter—some of its founders were heavily involved in the early days of that platform—although it’s not simply a Twitter replacement. The developers behind BlueSky propose a platform free from some of the constraints that have bogged down more established networks. They aim to create a space where transparency, user control and community-driven content curation take centre stage.

For independent musicians, that could mean a space in which they may more easily manage their audience interactions. One big selling point is the promise of a protocol that will allow users to retain greater authority over how they build and display content.

In a world where so many social media giants are governed by algorithms, BlueSky’s attempt to shift the balance of power towards creators is noteworthy. Of course, as with any new social platform, it’s impossible to predict how it will develop over time. Early adopters could gain significant traction if the network takes off, but the outcome is never guaranteed.

The Advantages of Joining 

  1. The Autonomy Appeal

BlueSky is marketed as a different approach to online interaction, which is tempting for many artists who have felt stifled by more traditional networks. The idea that you can enjoy more autonomy over how you share your content and how you grow your following has considerable appeal. Independent artists often feel overshadowed on massive, crowded platforms, where verified icons or big brands can hog much of the spotlight. BlueSky’s relatively small user base, in these early days, could be inviting to those who’d prefer to cultivate a more authentic, tight-knit community around their music.

  1. Early Adopter Advantage

Being an early adopter of any new network can carry a sense of novelty. If the platform manages to gain momentum, you might find yourself with a loyal following you’ve built from the ground up. Early adopters are often the ones who set the tone and shape a platform’s culture. If you can position yourself as a musician deeply attuned to BlueSky’s ethos, you may stand out more than you would on oversaturated platforms. This sense of early influence can prove valuable in forming close relationships with your audience and possibly opening doors to future opportunities—collaborations, live streams, or special sessions that capture your corner of the network’s attention.

  1. Sense of Community and Collaboration

One of BlueSky’s selling points is its emphasis on community. Decentralised principles suggest that top-down control will be less present than on mainstream platforms, which usually revolve around algorithms designed to push certain types of content to the top. BlueSky’s more open-ended environment means that communities could evolve in a more organic manner. For musicians, this is especially important. If you’re able to create meaningful connections with other artists, influencers or tastemakers (without dealing with hidden sorting systems), you might forge collaborative relationships more readily.

  1. Direct Access to Supporters

With so many distractions on larger social networks, many fans miss posts or updates from their favourite artists. BlueSky’s design aims to make it simpler for users to keep track of content from accounts they care about. If these principles hold true, you could reap the rewards of a more reliable reach. In practice, that means supporters are more likely to see and engage with your announcements, music videos or forthcoming tour dates. Greater transparency over the feed experience suggests fewer frustrations around unpredictable dips in your post’s visibility. That directness can build a stronger bond with your following.

The Disadvantages of Joining

  1. Another Platform to Manage

The obvious sticking point: do musicians really need another social network to maintain? Independent artists are already spread thin, juggling creation, live shows, merchandise, streaming promotions, YouTube content, and more. Adding yet another digital platform often translates to more time spent scheduling updates, responding to messages, and planning campaigns. If you don’t have a manager or a dedicated team, it can be daunting. There’s a genuine danger that your focus might end up fractured, making it difficult to do justice to each platform while still leaving time for writing new material or perfecting your live set.

  1. Uncertain Growth

Every new social media platform faces its fair share of hype, but not all of them find lasting traction. Consider the ephemeral nature of many apps that have soared into the public consciousness, only to fade away in the face of stiff competition. If BlueSky doesn’t attract enough mainstream attention or fails to achieve a critical mass of users, you might invest precious energy in a platform that doesn’t boost your music career. While there’s no harm in testing the waters, you could end up pouring valuable resources into a niche platform that never steps out of Twitter’s or Instagram’s shadow.

  1. Potential Monetisation Challenges

A platform’s monetisation options can play a big role in a musician’s decision to spend time there. Right now, BlueSky is in the early stages of rolling out its features. It might take a while before monetisation tools—such as integrated tipping, subscription-based models, or robust e-commerce support—arrive on the platform. If your main objective is to monetise your content and sustain your career financially, you might find more immediate results on established sites such as Bandcamp, Patreon, or direct music streaming services. That’s not to say BlueSky won’t evolve to support creators, but there’s a lot of guesswork involved in deciding whether the platform will provide stable avenues for income.

  1. Oversaturation Could Happen Eventually

Every new platform starts out with minimal content. That can be an advantage, but it won’t stay that way forever. The more popular BlueSky becomes, the likelier it is that bigger names and corporate entities will join in and attempt to shape the platform for their own objectives. Should that happen, early adopters might find themselves overshadowed, or forced to engage in the same kind of pay-to-play advertising that has become common on other platforms. While BlueSky emphasises decentralisation and transparency, there’s always the possibility that the reality of funding, server costs, or user demand will inevitably alter the platform’s original vision.

The Role of Social Media Posting Tools

If you do decide to invest in a presence on BlueSky—alongside your existing accounts on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook—one important aspect to consider is how to effectively manage your posts. Consistency and time management are two of the biggest challenges for any artist. It’s one thing to gain your following’s interest, but holding their attention with regular updates while still devoting enough energy to your music can be tricky.

That’s where social media posting tools come in. Metricool is a prime example of a scheduling and analytics platform that allows you to crosspost updates across multiple networks. Rather than logging into each platform individually, you can compose one main update and publish it automatically on a host of social channels. This can help ensure you maintain a cohesive presence, no matter how many platforms you choose to occupy.

Metricool goes beyond a simple posting schedule by providing thorough analytics that help you understand how your content is performing. You can track engagement rates, see which posts generate the most interest, and then adapt your strategy accordingly. This birds-eye view of your digital presence can save you from drowning in endless streams of data, especially if you’re juggling multiple networks. Tools like Metricool also simplify content repurposing, giving you an easy way to tailor one piece of content for different audiences or at different times.

One of the main ways that posting tools can lighten your burden is by allowing you to plan content in advance. If you have a new single on the way, you can schedule posts in the lead-up to its release to build anticipation. After the track is out, you can queue up more posts thanking fans for their support, inviting them to stream the song, or watch the video. If you’re playing live shows, you can create a regular series of date reminders without having to think about it daily. This approach frees you up to stay creative and focused on writing, rehearsing, or simply recharging.

Is BlueSky Right for You?

Deciding whether to join BlueSky, as an independent artist, depends largely on your personal approach to digital engagement. If you’re someone who thrives on new platforms, has a knack for community building, and likes being part of something experimental, it may be a good fit. The opportunity to position yourself as a core part of a budding network could give your music extra visibility, particularly if the platform resonates with your aesthetic or message.

On the other hand, if you already feel worn out from chasing the next big thing, you might do well to wait and see whether BlueSky gains real traction. If your existing platforms are serving your career goals effectively, it’s entirely valid to keep your focus there. You could always claim a username on BlueSky and perform a light test run to gauge your comfort with the platform. That way, if it does flourish, you’ll be poised to move in more fully without too much commitment in the meantime.

Whatever decision you make, be sure it’s one that aligns with both your musical ambitions and your mental well-being. The garnering social media hype can be exhilarating, but it’s also rife with pressures to be seen and heard constantly. Overcommitting to social media can sap your creativity. If you’re relying on a single network for all your exposure, you might miss out on the benefits of diversifying. On the other hand, juggling too many platforms often results in diluted efforts all around. 

Article by Amelia Vandergast

Is the Concept of the Follower Fading?

Posted on 19 January 2025
followers

The social media landscape has always been volatile, but the past few years have seen it transform in ways that have left independent artists grappling with how to maintain visibility and connection. Platforms that once promised to level the playing field now bury posts in an endless scroll of algorithmically curated content, often prioritising paid promotions over organic reach.

This raises the question: is the concept of the follower fading into irrelevance? And more importantly, how can independent artists adapt to ensure their creative output isn’t lost in the noise?

To explore this, we must first dissect the difference between a fan and a follower, analyse the shifting sands of social media algorithms, and examine how platforms like Patreon could be the key to sustaining deeper connections. If you’re an independent artist wondering how to navigate these murky waters, read on.

Follower vs Fan: The Vital Distinction

Before exploring the issue, let’s establish what separates a follower from a fan. A follower is someone who clicks that ‘follow’ button, perhaps out of mild interest or curiosity. They might engage with a post now and then, but their loyalty is tenuous. They’re a number on your profile, not necessarily a person invested in your art or creative arc.

Fans, on the other hand, are the lifeblood of an independent artist’s career. They buy your merch, stream your music repeatedly, and make the effort to attend gigs. They’re emotionally connected to your art in a way that transcends casual scrolling. While followers may fluctuate with the tides of trends, fans stick around because they’ve found something in your music that resonates.

This distinction is crucial because the modern social media model seems more geared towards attracting fleeting followers than cultivating devoted fans. Platforms encourage growth through viral content, but as many artists have discovered, virality doesn’t necessarily translate into longevity.

The Algorithmic Black Hole

One of the most significant challenges for independent artists today is visibility. Algorithms have evolved from simple chronological feeds to complex systems designed to keep users glued to the platform. While this may be effective for increasing screen time, it’s a nightmare for artists trying to reach their audience. Posts often get lost unless you pay for sponsored ads or consistently produce content that the algorithm deems “engaging.”

This problem is compounded by the sheer volume of content being uploaded every second. Even your most dedicated followers might not see your updates unless they actively seek you out. As a result, the value of having a large follower count has diminished. What’s the point of 10,000 followers if only 2% of them ever see your posts?

For independent artists, this is particularly damaging. Many rely on social media as their primary means of promotion, yet they’re forced to navigate an ecosystem that doesn’t prioritise their needs. The emphasis on short-form, trend-driven content—like TikTok’s dance challenges or Instagram Reels—often feels at odds with the depth and authenticity that most musicians aim to convey.

Patreon: A Refuge for Artists and Fans

If social media platforms are a turbulent sea, Patreon is an island of stability. Unlike platforms reliant on algorithms, Patreon allows artists to connect directly with their most dedicated supporters. By offering subscription-based access to exclusive content, it shifts the focus from chasing followers to nurturing fans.

Patreon’s model is simple yet revolutionary: fans pledge a monthly amount in exchange for perks like early access to songs, behind-the-scenes content, or personalised shoutouts. This not only creates a reliable income stream but also fosters a sense of community and mutual investment. Unlike social media, where updates can be missed, Patreon ensures that your fans receive every post, strengthening their connection to your work.

For independent artists, this platform offers a chance to escape the algorithmic rat race and focus on deepening relationships with their core audience. It’s not about reaching everyone; it’s about reaching the right people—those who genuinely care about your art and are willing to support it.

What to Post on Patreon: Building Connection and Value

To make the most of Patreon, it’s essential to provide value beyond what’s available on free platforms. But what does that look like? Here are a few ideas to help you get started:

Exclusive Music Previews: Share demos, acoustic versions, or unreleased tracks. Giving your fans a sneak peek into your creative process makes them feel part of your journey.

Behind-the-Scenes Content: Whether it’s footage from the studio, tour diaries, or candid moments, fans love seeing the raw, unpolished side of their favourite artists.

Live Streams and Q&A Sessions: Host intimate performances or interactive chats where fans can ask questions. This creates a sense of immediacy and personal connection.

Merch Discounts and Early Access: Reward your subscribers with perks like first dibs on new merchandise or discounted prices. It’s a simple way to show appreciation while adding tangible value.

Educational Content: Share tips, tutorials, or insights into your creative process. This can be particularly appealing to fans who are aspiring musicians themselves.

Personalised Content: Whether it’s a handwritten thank-you note, a custom playlist, or a birthday shoutout, small gestures can leave a lasting impression.

The key is to strike a balance between professional and personal. Fans want to feel closer to you as an artist, but they also want content that justifies their subscription. By providing a mix of exclusive material and meaningful interaction, you can cultivate a loyal community that supports you for the long haul.

Adapting to the New Reality

So, is the concept of the follower fading? In some ways, yes. The traditional notion of a follower as a guaranteed supporter no longer holds up in an age where algorithms dictate visibility and engagement. But that doesn’t mean independent artists are powerless.

By focusing on platforms like Patreon, artists can bypass the limitations of traditional social media and create direct, meaningful connections with their fans. This requires a shift in mindset from chasing numbers to nurturing relationships. It’s not about going viral; it’s about building a sustainable career rooted in authenticity and mutual respect.

For artists willing to adapt, the fading relevance of followers could be a blessing in disguise. It’s an opportunity to redefine success, prioritising depth over breadth and quality over quantity. While social media may still have its place in reaching new audiences, platforms like Patreon offer a way to keep your most devoted fans firmly in your corner.

Read more about the impending Facebook changes here.

Article by Amelia Vandergast